Schematex
rbd·IEC 61078·engineering, manufacturing·complexity 2/3·since v0.9.5

Dual-channel safety system (redundant chains)

A reliability block diagram of a 1-out-of-2 safety instrumented function — two independent sensor→logic→actuator channels in parallel, each a series chain. Shows how a parallel of series strings removes every single point of failure.

For the functional-safety engineer proving redundancy

Open in Playground →
rbd·§
↘ preview
100%
Dual-channel trip (1oo2) Reliability block diagram: 6 blocks. System reliability R = 0.99707. Highest reliability-importance block: S1. No single point of failure — every block has redundancy in the success path. Dual-channel trip (1oo2) System reliability R = 0.99707 Sensor A R=0.97 Logic A R=0.995 Valve A R=0.98 Sensor B R=0.97 Logic B R=0.995 Valve B R=0.98
UTF-8 · LF · 13 lines · 281 chars✓ parsed·2.8 ms·4.4 KB SVG

What this shows

A 1-out-of-2 (1oo2) safety architecture: two complete sensor→logic→valve channels run in parallel, so the trip still fires if either channel works end-to-end. Each channel is itself a series chain — a channel needs all three of its elements.

Redundancy removes the single points of failure. Each channel alone has reliability 0.97·0.995·0.98 ≈ 0.946; in parallel the system reaches 1 − (1−0.946)² ≈ 0.997. Because no single block's failure drops the system to zero, the engine reports no single point of failure — the structural goal of a redundant safety function, proven by computation rather than asserted.

RBD syntax