Schematex
rbd·IEC 61078 (RBD) + IEC 61810 / MIL-HDBK-217 (R(t))·engineering, manufacturing·complexity 3/3·since v0.9.5

Pump station reliability over a 1-year mission (R(t))

A reliability block diagram evaluated at a mission time — two redundant pumps with exponential (MTBF) and Weibull failure distributions. The engine computes R(t) for each block from its distribution and rolls it up to the system reliability at t = 8760 hours.

For the reliability engineer sizing a mission

Open in Playground →
rbd·§
↘ preview
100%
Pump Station — 1-year mission Reliability block diagram: 3 blocks. System reliability R = 0.61201. Single point of failure: CTRL. Highest reliability-importance block: CTRL. Mission time t = 8760; block reliabilities with a rate/MTBF/Weibull are evaluated as R(t). Pump Station — 1-year mission System reliability R(t=8760) = 0.61201 Controller R=0.83929 Pump A R=0.41645 Pump B R=0.53595
UTF-8 · LF · 9 lines · 201 chars✓ parsed·1.2 ms·3.4 KB SVG

What this shows

Static reliabilities are the entry point; real RAMS work is reliability over a mission. Here mission: 8760 (one year in hours) turns each block's failure distribution into an R(t): the controller and Pump A use an exponential model from their MTBF, while Pump B uses a Weibull (β = 1.5, so a gently increasing hazard — wear-out).

The engine evaluates R(t) per block and composes it. Pump A's e^(−8760/10000) ≈ 0.42 and Pump B's e^(−(8760/12000)^1.5) ≈ 0.54 combine in parallel to ≈ 0.73, then multiply by the controller in series — the headline reads R(t=8760) = …. Change the mission time and every figure, and the importance ranking, recomputes. Constant R= blocks still work and mix freely with distributions.

RBD syntax