Schematex
comparison·Pugh, Total Design (1991) · ASQ decision matrix·logistics, operations·complexity 3/3·since v0.9.8

Distribution centre site — weighted decision matrix

A Pugh weighted decision matrix scoring four cities against five weighted criteria, with the current favourite as the baseline; the engine computes each total, the ranking and the winner.

For the logistics director choosing a site

Open in Playground →
schematex§ source-defined
Site for the second distribution centre Decision matrix: 4 options × 5 weighted criteria. Winner: "Salt Lake City" — weighted score 77, highest of 4 options. Site for the second distribution centre Reno datum Salt Lake City Phoenix Boise Labour availability ×5 3 5 4 2 Two-day truck reach tocustomers ×5 3 4 4 2 Land and build cost ×4 3 3 4 5 State tax incentives ×3 4 4 3 3 Heat and water risk ×2 3 4 1 4 Weighted total 60 #3 77 #1 67 #2 57 #4 vs datum 0 +17 +7 -3 Winner: "Salt Lake City" — weighted score 77, highest of 4 options.
33 lines · 766 chars
✓ parsed·0.0 ms·0 B
100%

Scenario

A logistics director picks the site for a second distribution centre. Four cities — Reno, Salt Lake City, Phoenix and Boise — are scored from 1 to 5 against five criteria, each weighted by importance. Reno, the current favourite, is the baseline that every other option is compared against.

Annotation key

How to read

Each column's total is the sum of score × weight. Salt Lake City wins with 77, 17 points ahead of Reno's 60, mainly on labour availability and truck reach. Phoenix is second with 67 despite a score of 1 on heat and water risk. Boise comes last at 57 — the cheapest land, but weak on the two most heavily weighted criteria. Change a weight or a score and the ranking is recomputed.

Comparison syntax